Europe talks tough on Russia — but how consistent is it actually?
Armin Sumansky, a Gen Z Czech student at Bates College, turns the usual question around in Part 2 of our conversation: where Europe's line on Russia goes soft when it's inconvenient, where European consensus on migration is really heading, whether American power makes the world safer or more dangerous, what Europe and the US should actually do about Ukraine, and whether his generation's views travel beyond college-educated peers.
This is Part 2 of our conversation with Armin, a second-year student at Bates College triple-majoring in Economics, Politics, and European Studies, heading to the London School of Economics next year.
Part 1 covered Gen Z framing, why he chose an American college, and how his family's history under Soviet-bloc Czechoslovakia shapes his read on Russia.
Watch Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IxoT5YY__c&t=804s
Topics in this segment: 0:00 Cold open — Ceuta and Europe's migration contradiction – Where European consensus on migration is actually heading – Is Europe's Russia policy as principled as it claims? – Does American power reduce conflict or cause it? – What should Europe — and the US — actually do about Ukraine? – Is there a real US/Europe Gen Z perception gap? – Armin's new political journal and his plans at LSE
The Unpopular View gives credentialed people a platform to make the case for views that are popular with some and unpopular with others. This episode steps outside the usual development-policy lane to hear directly from a Gen Z European.
Subscribe for more conversations that don't fit either side's script: https://www.youtube.com/@UCW4HD_vP6WXjZPn7_qcTXeQ
All Unpopular View Episodes: https://theunpopularview.com/
Read episode pageSource episode